PKW - Wybory samorządowe 2006

Mayor election - 2nd ballot

Precinct number Number of Turnout Number of votes
electors dispensed ballot cards cast valid % valid
Precinct no. 1 1724 598

34.69%

598 587 98.16%
Precinct no. 2 966 198

20.50%

198 197 99.49%
Precinct no. 3 2104 635

30.18%

635 625 98.43%
Precinct no. 4 1904 494

25.95%

493 485 98.38%
Precinct no. 5 1496 453

30.28%

453 446 98.45%
Precinct no. 6 2426 688

28.36%

688 677 98.40%
Precinct no. 7 2184 533

24.40%

533 525 98.50%
Precinct no. 8 1443 397

27.51%

397 390 98.24%
Precinct no. 9 963 235

24.40%

235 228 97.02%
Precinct no. 10 864 320

37.04%

320 312 97.50%
Precinct no. 11 1736 568

32.72%

568 561 98.77%
Precinct no. 12 1773 625

35.25%

625 618 98.88%
Precinct no. 13 927 235

25.35%

235 233 99.15%
Precinct no. 14 1451 404

27.84%

404 400 99.01%
Precinct no. 15 1598 556

34.79%

555 541 97.48%
Precinct no. 16 1560 521

33.40%

521 514 98.66%
Precinct no. 17 1671 368

22.02%

368 354 96.20%
Precinct no. 18 1251 347

27.74%

347 343 98.85%
Precinct no. 19 1017 199

19.57%

199 195 97.99%
Precinct no. 20 2050 559

27.27%

558 547 98.03%
   Page 1 of 2    Next page
Totalling: 31265 9010

28.82%

9007 8854 98.30%

2nd ballot on 26.11.2006

Number Family name and given names Age Education Address, party membership and endorsements Number of votes % votes
1 Rychłowski Andrzej Sławomir 43 średnie Malbork, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Platforma Obywatelska RP, member of Platformy Obywatelskiej Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej 5332 60.22%
2 Wilk Jan Tadeusz 55 wyższe Malbork, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców Nasz Malbork, not a member of any political party 3522 39.78%

Precincts

Precinct number Liczba głosów ważnych Rychłowski Andrzej Sławomir Głosów oddanych na kandydatów Wilk Jan Tadeusz
Valid votes for the candidate Valid votes for the candidate
Number of % valid Number of % valid
Precinct no. 1 587 416

70.87%

416
171
171

29.13%

Precinct no. 2 197 116

58.88%

116
81
81

41.12%

Precinct no. 3 625 361

57.76%

361
264
264

42.24%

Precinct no. 4 485 297

61.24%

297
188
188

38.76%

Precinct no. 5 446 275

61.66%

275
171
171

38.34%

Precinct no. 6 677 441

65.14%

441
236
236

34.86%

Precinct no. 7 525 358

68.19%

358
167
167

31.81%

Precinct no. 8 390 221

56.67%

221
169
169

43.33%

Precinct no. 9 228 148

64.91%

148
80
80

35.09%

Precinct no. 10 312 170

54.49%

170
142
142

45.51%

Precinct no. 11 561 309

55.08%

309
252
252

44.92%

Precinct no. 12 618 300

48.54%

300
318
318

51.46%

Precinct no. 13 233 138

59.23%

138
95
95

40.77%

Precinct no. 14 400 270

67.50%

270
130
130

32.50%

Precinct no. 15 541 302

55.82%

302
239
239

44.18%

Precinct no. 16 514 292

56.81%

292
222
222

43.19%

Precinct no. 17 354 196

55.37%

196
158
158

44.63%

Precinct no. 18 343 202

58.89%

202
141
141

41.11%

Precinct no. 19 195 117

60.00%

117
78
78

40.00%

Precinct no. 20 547 350

63.99%

350
197
197

36.01%

   Page 1 of 2    Next page