PKW - Wybory samorządowe 2006

City president election - 2nd ballot

Precinct number Number of Turnout Number of votes
electors dispensed ballot cards cast valid % valid
Precinct no. 1 1918 550

28.68%

550 549 99.82%
Precinct no. 2 2077 591

28.45%

591 588 99.49%
Precinct no. 3 1315 398

30.27%

398 392 98.49%
Precinct no. 4 2108 654

31.02%

654 645 98.62%
Precinct no. 5 1697 447

26.34%

447 438 97.99%
Precinct no. 6 2298 670

29.16%

670 665 99.25%
Precinct no. 7 1780 356

20.00%

356 349 98.03%
Precinct no. 8 1814 386

21.28%

386 373 96.63%
Precinct no. 9 1720 452

26.28%

452 449 99.34%
Precinct no. 10 1742 497

28.53%

496 494 99.60%
Precinct no. 11 2006 717

35.74%

717 706 98.47%
Precinct no. 12 1651 577

34.95%

577 567 98.27%
Precinct no. 13 1837 517

28.14%

517 506 97.87%
Precinct no. 14 2404 695

28.91%

693 677 97.69%
Precinct no. 15 2213 589

26.62%

589 579 98.30%
Precinct no. 16 2081 734

35.27%

734 721 98.23%
Precinct no. 17 2238 715

31.95%

715 697 97.48%
Precinct no. 18 2615 849

32.47%

849 833 98.12%
Precinct no. 19 2235 538

24.07%

538 538 100.00%
Precinct no. 20 44 4

9.09%

4 4 100.00%
   Page 1 of 2    Next page
Totalling: 37909 10982

28.97%

10979 10816 98.52%

2nd ballot on 26.11.2006

Number Family name and given names Age Education Address, party membership and endorsements Number of votes % votes
1 Neumann Sławomir Arkadiusz 38 wyższe Starogard Gdański, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Platforma Obywatelska RP, endorsed by Platformę Obywatelską RP, member of Platformy Obywatelskiej Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej 4511 41.71%
2 Stachowicz Edmund Kazimierz 58 wyższe Starogard Gdański, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców EDMUNDA STACHOWICZA, member of Sojuszu Lewicy Demokratycznej 6305 58.29%

Precincts

Precinct number Liczba głosów ważnych Neumann Sławomir Arkadiusz Głosów oddanych na kandydatów Stachowicz Edmund Kazimierz
Valid votes for the candidate Valid votes for the candidate
Number of % valid Number of % valid
Precinct no. 1 549 190

34.61%

190
359
359

65.39%

Precinct no. 2 588 250

42.52%

250
338
338

57.48%

Precinct no. 3 392 180

45.92%

180
212
212

54.08%

Precinct no. 4 645 252

39.07%

252
393
393

60.93%

Precinct no. 5 438 154

35.16%

154
284
284

64.84%

Precinct no. 6 665 289

43.46%

289
376
376

56.54%

Precinct no. 7 349 126

36.10%

126
223
223

63.90%

Precinct no. 8 373 148

39.68%

148
225
225

60.32%

Precinct no. 9 449 186

41.43%

186
263
263

58.57%

Precinct no. 10 494 194

39.27%

194
300
300

60.73%

Precinct no. 11 706 254

35.98%

254
452
452

64.02%

Precinct no. 12 567 251

44.27%

251
316
316

55.73%

Precinct no. 13 506 202

39.92%

202
304
304

60.08%

Precinct no. 14 677 309

45.64%

309
368
368

54.36%

Precinct no. 15 579 289

49.91%

289
290
290

50.09%

Precinct no. 16 721 292

40.50%

292
429
429

59.50%

Precinct no. 17 697 318

45.62%

318
379
379

54.38%

Precinct no. 18 833 399

47.90%

399
434
434

52.10%

Precinct no. 19 538 206

38.29%

206
332
332

61.71%

Precinct no. 20 4 1

25.00%

1
3
3

75.00%

   Page 1 of 2    Next page