PKW - Wybory samorządowe 2006

City president election - 2nd ballot

Precinct number Number of Turnout Number of votes
electors dispensed ballot cards cast valid % valid
Precinct no. 1 1207 327

27.09%

327 324 99.08%
Precinct no. 2 1062 285

26.84%

285 274 96.14%
Precinct no. 3 1915 634

33.11%

633 631 99.68%
Precinct no. 4 1210 334

27.60%

334 328 98.20%
Precinct no. 5 1331 433

32.53%

433 422 97.46%
Precinct no. 6 1527 418

27.37%

418 410 98.09%
Precinct no. 7 1523 400

26.26%

400 393 98.25%
Precinct no. 8 1514 564

37.25%

564 556 98.58%
Precinct no. 9 1245 292

23.45%

292 291 99.66%
Precinct no. 10 1700 484

28.47%

483 470 97.31%
Precinct no. 11 1723 484

28.09%

484 477 98.55%
Precinct no. 12 1418 380

26.80%

380 371 97.63%
Precinct no. 13 1164 255

21.91%

255 251 98.43%
Precinct no. 14 1900 344

18.11%

343 333 97.08%
Precinct no. 15 1951 534

27.37%

534 530 99.25%
Precinct no. 16 2012 641

31.86%

641 632 98.60%
Precinct no. 17 876 275

31.39%

275 273 99.27%
Precinct no. 18 820 221

26.95%

221 220 99.55%
Precinct no. 19 832 194

23.32%

194 190 97.94%
Precinct no. 20 906 242

26.71%

242 239 98.76%
   Page 1 of 2    Next page
Totalling: 47582 13953

29.32%

13948 13740 98.51%

2nd ballot on 26.11.2006

Number Family name and given names Age Education Address, party membership and endorsements Number of votes % votes
1 Gajda Radosław Władysław 39 wyższe Zgierz, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, member of Prawa i Sprawiedliwości 5489 39.95%
2 Sokół Jerzy 50 wyższe Zgierz, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców FORUM OBYWATELSKIE, not a member of any political party 8251 60.05%

Precincts

Precinct number Liczba głosów ważnych Gajda Radosław Władysław Głosów oddanych na kandydatów Sokół Jerzy
Valid votes for the candidate Valid votes for the candidate
Number of % valid Number of % valid
Precinct no. 1 324 144

44.44%

144
180
180

55.56%

Precinct no. 2 274 99

36.13%

99
175
175

63.87%

Precinct no. 3 631 310

49.13%

310
321
321

50.87%

Precinct no. 4 328 158

48.17%

158
170
170

51.83%

Precinct no. 5 422 191

45.26%

191
231
231

54.74%

Precinct no. 6 410 197

48.05%

197
213
213

51.95%

Precinct no. 7 393 165

41.98%

165
228
228

58.02%

Precinct no. 8 556 251

45.14%

251
305
305

54.86%

Precinct no. 9 291 95

32.65%

95
196
196

67.35%

Precinct no. 10 470 196

41.70%

196
274
274

58.30%

Precinct no. 11 477 157

32.91%

157
320
320

67.09%

Precinct no. 12 371 124

33.42%

124
247
247

66.58%

Precinct no. 13 251 95

37.85%

95
156
156

62.15%

Precinct no. 14 333 130

39.04%

130
203
203

60.96%

Precinct no. 15 530 227

42.83%

227
303
303

57.17%

Precinct no. 16 632 204

32.28%

204
428
428

67.72%

Precinct no. 17 273 39

14.29%

39
234
234

85.71%

Precinct no. 18 220 85

38.64%

85
135
135

61.36%

Precinct no. 19 190 69

36.32%

69
121
121

63.68%

Precinct no. 20 239 84

35.15%

84
155
155

64.85%

   Page 1 of 2    Next page