PKW - Wybory samorządowe 2006

Mayor election - 2nd ballot

Precinct number Number of Turnout Number of votes
electors dispensed ballot cards cast valid % valid
Precinct no. 1 778 275

35.35%

275 268 97.45%
Precinct no. 2 1120 454

40.54%

454 450 99.12%
Precinct no. 3 1632 616

37.75%

616 608 98.70%
Precinct no. 4 1870 776

41.50%

776 767 98.84%
Precinct no. 5 1650 697

42.24%

697 683 97.99%
Precinct no. 6 452 162

35.84%

162 162 100.00%
Precinct no. 7 2100 823

39.19%

823 819 99.51%
Precinct no. 8 1407 473

33.62%

473 470 99.37%
Precinct no. 9 506 239

47.23%

239 236 98.74%
Precinct no. 10 845 373

44.14%

373 369 98.93%
Precinct no. 11 909 310

34.10%

310 302 97.42%
Precinct no. 12 314 105

33.44%

105 100 95.24%
Precinct no. 13 627 266

42.42%

266 262 98.50%
Precinct no. 14 661 219

33.13%

219 217 99.09%
Precinct no. 15 913 350

38.34%

350 349 99.71%
Precinct no. 16 764 365

47.77%

365 363 99.45%
Precinct no. 17 484 197

40.70%

197 197 100.00%
Precinct no. 18 807 230

28.50%

230 228 99.13%
Precinct no. 19 634 254

40.06%

254 252 99.21%
Precinct no. 20 908 393

43.28%

393 387 98.47%
   Page 1 of 2    Next page
Totalling: 20855 8121

38.94%

8121 8029 98.87%

2nd ballot on 26.11.2006

Number Family name and given names Age Education Address, party membership and endorsements Number of votes % votes
1 Kuchczyński Krzysztof 49 wyższe Namysłów, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy "Wspólnoty Obywatelskiej 2006r.", member of Polskiego Stronnictwa Ludowego 4884 60.83%
2 Maciąg Adam 56 wyższe Namysłów, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Forum Rozwoju Ziemi Namysłowskiej, not a member of any political party 3145 39.17%

Precincts

Precinct number Liczba głosów ważnych Kuchczyński Krzysztof Głosów oddanych na kandydatów Maciąg Adam
Valid votes for the candidate Valid votes for the candidate
Number of % valid Number of % valid
Precinct no. 1 268 115

42.91%

115
153
153

57.09%

Precinct no. 2 450 229

50.89%

229
221
221

49.11%

Precinct no. 3 608 293

48.19%

293
315
315

51.81%

Precinct no. 4 767 376

49.02%

376
391
391

50.98%

Precinct no. 5 683 373

54.61%

373
310
310

45.39%

Precinct no. 6 162 92

56.79%

92
70
70

43.21%

Precinct no. 7 819 466

56.90%

466
353
353

43.10%

Precinct no. 8 470 244

51.91%

244
226
226

48.09%

Precinct no. 9 236 152

64.41%

152
84
84

35.59%

Precinct no. 10 369 265

71.82%

265
104
104

28.18%

Precinct no. 11 302 181

59.93%

181
121
121

40.07%

Precinct no. 12 100 63

63.00%

63
37
37

37.00%

Precinct no. 13 262 192

73.28%

192
70
70

26.72%

Precinct no. 14 217 94

43.32%

94
123
123

56.68%

Precinct no. 15 349 242

69.34%

242
107
107

30.66%

Precinct no. 16 363 330

90.91%

330
33
33

9.09%

Precinct no. 17 197 175

88.83%

175
22
22

11.17%

Precinct no. 18 228 156

68.42%

156
72
72

31.58%

Precinct no. 19 252 181

71.83%

181
71
71

28.17%

Precinct no. 20 387 304

78.55%

304
83
83

21.45%

   Page 1 of 2    Next page