City president election - 2nd ballot
Precinct number | Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | ||
Precinct no. 21 | 539 | 129 |
23.93% ![]() |
129 | 129 | 100.00% |
Precinct no. 22 | 1743 | 599 |
34.37% ![]() |
599 | 592 | 98.83% |
Precinct no. 23 | 1365 | 492 |
36.04% ![]() |
491 | 485 | 98.78% |
Precinct no. 24 | 1433 | 429 |
29.94% ![]() |
428 | 421 | 98.36% |
Precinct no. 25 | 1656 | 604 |
36.47% ![]() |
603 | 593 | 98.34% |
Precinct no. 26 | 1450 | 454 |
31.31% ![]() |
454 | 445 | 98.02% |
Precinct no. 27 | 1680 | 517 |
30.77% ![]() |
517 | 512 | 99.03% |
Precinct no. 28 | 1645 | 478 |
29.06% ![]() |
478 | 474 | 99.16% |
Precinct no. 29 | 1286 | 430 |
33.44% ![]() |
430 | 425 | 98.84% |
Precinct no. 30 | 1472 | 489 |
33.22% ![]() |
490 | 479 | 97.76% |
Precinct no. 31 | 1620 | 539 |
33.27% ![]() |
539 | 531 | 98.52% |
Precinct no. 32 | 2394 | 723 |
30.20% ![]() |
723 | 715 | 98.89% |
Precinct no. 33 | 1302 | 303 |
23.27% ![]() |
303 | 299 | 98.68% |
Precinct no. 34 | 126 | 14 |
11.11% ![]() |
14 | 14 | 100.00% |
Precinct no. 35 | 21 | 12 |
57.14% ![]() |
12 | 11 | 91.67% |
Precinct no. 36 | 14 | 0 |
0.00% ![]() |
0 | 0 | — |
Previous page Page 2 of 2 | ||||||
Totalling: | 47582 | 13953 |
29.32% ![]() |
13948 | 13740 | 98.51% |
2nd ballot on 26.11.2006
Number | Family name and given names | Age | Education | Address, party membership and endorsements | Number of votes | % votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gajda Radosław Władysław | 39 | wyższe | Zgierz, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, member of Prawa i Sprawiedliwości | 5489 | 39.95% |
2 | Sokół Jerzy | 50 | wyższe | Zgierz, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców FORUM OBYWATELSKIE, not a member of any political party | 8251 | 60.05% |
Precincts
Precinct number | Liczba głosów ważnych | Gajda Radosław Władysław | Głosów oddanych na kandydatów | Sokół Jerzy | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Valid votes for the candidate | Valid votes for the candidate | |||||
Number of | % valid | Number of | % valid | |||
Precinct no. 21 | 129 | 69 |
53.49% |
69
![]() ![]() 60 |
60 |
46.51% |
Precinct no. 22 | 592 | 270 |
45.61% |
270
![]() ![]() 322 |
322 |
54.39% |
Precinct no. 23 | 485 | 186 |
38.35% |
186
![]() ![]() 299 |
299 |
61.65% |
Precinct no. 24 | 421 | 158 |
37.53% |
158
![]() ![]() 263 |
263 |
62.47% |
Precinct no. 25 | 593 | 222 |
37.44% |
222
![]() ![]() 371 |
371 |
62.56% |
Precinct no. 26 | 445 | 154 |
34.61% |
154
![]() ![]() 291 |
291 |
65.39% |
Precinct no. 27 | 512 | 210 |
41.02% |
210
![]() ![]() 302 |
302 |
58.98% |
Precinct no. 28 | 474 | 181 |
38.19% |
181
![]() ![]() 293 |
293 |
61.81% |
Precinct no. 29 | 425 | 148 |
34.82% |
148
![]() ![]() 277 |
277 |
65.18% |
Precinct no. 30 | 479 | 188 |
39.25% |
188
![]() ![]() 291 |
291 |
60.75% |
Precinct no. 31 | 531 | 187 |
35.22% |
187
![]() ![]() 344 |
344 |
64.78% |
Precinct no. 32 | 715 | 328 |
45.87% |
328
![]() ![]() 387 |
387 |
54.13% |
Precinct no. 33 | 299 | 152 |
50.84% |
152
![]() ![]() 147 |
147 |
49.16% |
Precinct no. 34 | 14 | 9 |
64.29% |
9
![]() ![]() 5 |
5 |
35.71% |
Precinct no. 35 | 11 | 7 |
63.64% |
7
![]() ![]() 4 |
4 |
36.36% |
Precinct no. 36 | 0 | 0 | — |
0
![]() ![]() 0 |
0 | — |
Previous page
Page 2 of
2