City president election - 2nd ballot
| Precinct number | Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | ||
| Precinct no. 21 | 1965 | 865 |
44.02% 
|
865 | 856 | 98.96% |
| Precinct no. 22 | 2317 | 882 |
38.07%
|
882 | 872 | 98.87% |
| Precinct no. 23 | 1731 | 636 |
36.74%
|
636 | 628 | 98.74% |
| Precinct no. 24 | 1495 | 729 |
48.76%
|
729 | 720 | 98.77% |
| Precinct no. 25 | 1592 | 656 |
41.21%
|
656 | 652 | 99.39% |
| Precinct no. 26 | 1880 | 734 |
39.04%
|
734 | 725 | 98.77% |
| Precinct no. 27 | 1137 | 465 |
40.90%
|
463 | 457 | 98.70% |
| Precinct no. 28 | 2070 | 890 |
43.00%
|
889 | 882 | 99.21% |
| Precinct no. 29 | 2213 | 921 |
41.62%
|
921 | 917 | 99.57% |
| Precinct no. 30 | 1694 | 646 |
38.13%
|
640 | 637 | 99.53% |
| Precinct no. 31 | 1429 | 459 |
32.12%
|
459 | 458 | 99.78% |
| Precinct no. 32 | 1491 | 508 |
34.07%
|
508 | 506 | 99.61% |
| Precinct no. 33 | 44 | 3 |
6.82%
|
3 | 3 | 100.00% |
| Precinct no. 34 | 62 | 27 |
43.55%
|
27 | 27 | 100.00% |
| Precinct no. 35 | 27 | 3 |
11.11%
|
3 | 3 | 100.00% |
| Precinct no. 36 | 55 | 27 |
49.09%
|
27 | 23 | 85.19% |
| Previous page Page 2 of 2 | ||||||
| Totalling: | 56253 | 20314 |
36.11%
|
20301 | 20108 | 99.05% |
2nd ballot on 26.11.2006
| Number | Family name and given names | Age | Education | Address, party membership and endorsements | Number of votes | % votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dziel Jaromir Wincenty | 45 | wyższe | Gniezno, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Platforma Obywatelska RP, member of Platformy Obywatelskiej Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej | 7224 | 35.93% |
| 2 | Kowalski Jacek | 56 | wyższe | Gniezno, submitted by Koalicyjny Komitet Wyborczy SLD+SDPL+PD+UP Lewica i Demokraci, member of Sojuszu Lewicy Demokratycznej | 12884 | 64.07% |
Precincts
| Precinct number | Liczba głosów ważnych | Dziel Jaromir Wincenty | Głosów oddanych na kandydatów | Kowalski Jacek | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Valid votes for the candidate | Valid votes for the candidate | |||||
| Number of | % valid | Number of | % valid | |||
| Precinct no. 21 | 856 | 263 |
30.72% |
263
593 |
593 |
69.28% |
| Precinct no. 22 | 872 | 293 |
33.60% |
293
579 |
579 |
66.40% |
| Precinct no. 23 | 628 | 180 |
28.66% |
180
448 |
448 |
71.34% |
| Precinct no. 24 | 720 | 234 |
32.50% |
234
486 |
486 |
67.50% |
| Precinct no. 25 | 652 | 239 |
36.66% |
239
413 |
413 |
63.34% |
| Precinct no. 26 | 725 | 246 |
33.93% |
246
479 |
479 |
66.07% |
| Precinct no. 27 | 457 | 122 |
26.70% |
122
335 |
335 |
73.30% |
| Precinct no. 28 | 882 | 311 |
35.26% |
311
571 |
571 |
64.74% |
| Precinct no. 29 | 917 | 354 |
38.60% |
354
563 |
563 |
61.40% |
| Precinct no. 30 | 637 | 220 |
34.54% |
220
417 |
417 |
65.46% |
| Precinct no. 31 | 458 | 167 |
36.46% |
167
291 |
291 |
63.54% |
| Precinct no. 32 | 506 | 186 |
36.76% |
186
320 |
320 |
63.24% |
| Precinct no. 33 | 3 | 0 | — |
0
3 |
3 |
100.00% |
| Precinct no. 34 | 27 | 9 |
33.33% |
9
18 |
18 |
66.67% |
| Precinct no. 35 | 3 | 1 |
33.33% |
1
2 |
2 |
66.67% |
| Precinct no. 36 | 23 | 7 |
30.43% |
7
16 |
16 |
69.57% |
Previous page
Page 2 of
2