City president election - 2nd ballot
Precinct number | Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | ||
Precinct no. 21 | 1959 | 709 |
36.19% |
709 | 687 | 96.90% |
Precinct no. 22 | 1695 | 692 |
40.83% |
692 | 686 | 99.13% |
Precinct no. 23 | 2041 | 804 |
39.39% |
804 | 798 | 99.25% |
Precinct no. 24 | 1113 | 398 |
35.76% |
398 | 394 | 98.99% |
Precinct no. 25 | 1197 | 452 |
37.76% |
452 | 445 | 98.45% |
Precinct no. 26 | 1343 | 519 |
38.64% |
519 | 500 | 96.34% |
Precinct no. 27 | 1111 | 449 |
40.41% |
449 | 445 | 99.11% |
Precinct no. 28 | 1844 | 785 |
42.57% |
785 | 749 | 95.41% |
Precinct no. 29 | 1852 | 733 |
39.58% |
733 | 698 | 95.23% |
Precinct no. 30 | 1311 | 421 |
32.11% |
421 | 420 | 99.76% |
Precinct no. 31 | 1717 | 675 |
39.31% |
675 | 674 | 99.85% |
Precinct no. 32 | 2258 | 843 |
37.33% |
843 | 836 | 99.17% |
Precinct no. 33 | 1633 | 709 |
43.42% |
709 | 691 | 97.46% |
Precinct no. 34 | 2156 | 941 |
43.65% |
941 | 918 | 97.56% |
Precinct no. 35 | 45 | 4 |
8.89% |
4 | 4 | 100.00% |
Precinct no. 36 | 20 | 20 |
100.00% |
20 | 17 | 85.00% |
Precinct no. 37 | 147 | 84 |
57.14% |
84 | 75 | 89.29% |
Previous page Page 2 of 2 | ||||||
Totalling: | 57482 | 21693 |
37.74% |
21688 | 21314 | 98.28% |
2nd ballot on 26.11.2006
Number | Family name and given names | Age | Education | Address, party membership and endorsements | Number of votes | % votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Rybka Zbigniew Piotr | 48 | wyższe | Jerzmanowa, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Obywatelskie Porozumienie Samorządowe, member of Partii Demokratycznej-demokraci.pl | 9293 | 43.60% |
2 | Zubowski Jan Kazimierz | 49 | wyższe | Głogów, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, member of Prawa i Sprawiedliwości | 12021 | 56.40% |
Precincts
Precinct number | Liczba głosów ważnych | Rybka Zbigniew Piotr | Głosów oddanych na kandydatów | Zubowski Jan Kazimierz | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Valid votes for the candidate | Valid votes for the candidate | |||||
Number of | % valid | Number of | % valid | |||
Precinct no. 21 | 687 | 272 |
39.59% |
272
415 |
415 |
60.41% |
Precinct no. 22 | 686 | 282 |
41.11% |
282
404 |
404 |
58.89% |
Precinct no. 23 | 798 | 307 |
38.47% |
307
491 |
491 |
61.53% |
Precinct no. 24 | 394 | 177 |
44.92% |
177
217 |
217 |
55.08% |
Precinct no. 25 | 445 | 182 |
40.90% |
182
263 |
263 |
59.10% |
Precinct no. 26 | 500 | 237 |
47.40% |
237
263 |
263 |
52.60% |
Precinct no. 27 | 445 | 206 |
46.29% |
206
239 |
239 |
53.71% |
Precinct no. 28 | 749 | 324 |
43.26% |
324
425 |
425 |
56.74% |
Precinct no. 29 | 698 | 357 |
51.15% |
357
341 |
341 |
48.85% |
Precinct no. 30 | 420 | 170 |
40.48% |
170
250 |
250 |
59.52% |
Precinct no. 31 | 674 | 321 |
47.63% |
321
353 |
353 |
52.37% |
Precinct no. 32 | 836 | 327 |
39.11% |
327
509 |
509 |
60.89% |
Precinct no. 33 | 691 | 314 |
45.44% |
314
377 |
377 |
54.56% |
Precinct no. 34 | 918 | 436 |
47.49% |
436
482 |
482 |
52.51% |
Precinct no. 35 | 4 | 2 |
50.00% |
2
2 |
2 |
50.00% |
Precinct no. 36 | 17 | 17 |
100.00% |
17
0 |
0 | — |
Precinct no. 37 | 75 | 27 |
36.00% |
27
48 |
48 |
64.00% |
Previous page
Page 2 of
2