PKW - Wybory samorządowe 2006

Reeve election - 2nd ballot

Precinct number Number of Turnout Number of votes
electors dispensed ballot cards cast valid % valid
Precinct no. 1 1349 855

63.38%

855 836 97.78%
Precinct no. 2 529 247

46.69%

247 245 99.19%
Precinct no. 3 1011 481

47.58%

480 478 99.58%
Precinct no. 4 773 333

43.08%

333 331 99.40%
Precinct no. 5 1102 566

51.36%

566 556 98.23%
Precinct no. 6 400 255

63.75%

255 251 98.43%
Precinct no. 7 576 227

39.41%

227 227 100.00%
Precinct no. 8 578 291

50.35%

291 288 98.97%
Precinct no. 9 403 230

57.07%

230 224 97.39%
Precinct no. 10 272 108

39.71%

108 106 98.15%
Precinct no. 11 522 216

41.38%

216 215 99.54%
Precinct no. 12 391 190

48.59%

190 190 100.00%
Precinct no. 13 186 101

54.30%

101 100 99.01%
Precinct no. 14 256 119

46.48%

119 115 96.64%
Totalling: 8348 4219

50.54%

4218 4162 98.67%

2nd ballot on 26.11.2006

Number Family name and given names Age Education Address, party membership and endorsements Number of votes % votes
1 Łatka Stanisław 40 wyższe Podegrodzie, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców Budżet i Odpowiedzialność, endorsed by Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, not a member of any political party 2257 54.23%
2 Paszek Edward 58 wyższe Podrzecze, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców STRAŻACY GMINY PODEGRODZIE, not a member of any political party 1905 45.77%

Precincts

Precinct number Liczba głosów ważnych Łatka Stanisław Głosów oddanych na kandydatów Paszek Edward
Valid votes for the candidate Valid votes for the candidate
Number of % valid Number of % valid
Precinct no. 1 836 636

76.08%

636
200
200

23.92%

Precinct no. 2 245 165

67.35%

165
80
80

32.65%

Precinct no. 3 478 326

68.20%

326
152
152

31.80%

Precinct no. 4 331 221

66.77%

221
110
110

33.23%

Precinct no. 5 556 102

18.35%

102
454
454

81.65%

Precinct no. 6 251 35

13.94%

35
216
216

86.06%

Precinct no. 7 227 129

56.83%

129
98
98

43.17%

Precinct no. 8 288 162

56.25%

162
126
126

43.75%

Precinct no. 9 224 153

68.30%

153
71
71

31.70%

Precinct no. 10 106 18

16.98%

18
88
88

83.02%

Precinct no. 11 215 35

16.28%

35
180
180

83.72%

Precinct no. 12 190 131

68.95%

131
59
59

31.05%

Precinct no. 13 100 60

60.00%

60
40
40

40.00%

Precinct no. 14 115 84

73.04%

84
31
31

26.96%