PKW - Wybory samorządowe 2006

Mayor election - 2nd ballot

Precinct number Number of Turnout Number of votes
electors dispensed ballot cards cast valid % valid
Precinct no. 1 2136 788

36.89%

788 783 99.37%
Precinct no. 2 1226 483

39.40%

483 475 98.34%
Precinct no. 3 1220 436

35.74%

436 430 98.62%
Precinct no. 4 1221 363

29.73%

363 362 99.72%
Precinct no. 5 1355 416

30.70%

416 413 99.28%
Precinct no. 6 1929 811

42.04%

803 798 99.38%
Precinct no. 7 1817 645

35.50%

645 643 99.69%
Precinct no. 8 1065 314

29.48%

314 310 98.73%
Precinct no. 9 2033 738

36.30%

738 731 99.05%
Precinct no. 10 1485 454

30.57%

454 448 98.68%
Precinct no. 11 725 187

25.79%

187 185 98.93%
Precinct no. 12 574 71

12.37%

71 71 100.00%
Precinct no. 13 1971 581

29.48%

581 573 98.62%
Precinct no. 14 1069 288

26.94%

288 286 99.31%
Precinct no. 15 1475 376

25.49%

376 373 99.20%
Precinct no. 16 1882 358

19.02%

357 354 99.16%
Precinct no. 17 808 240

29.70%

240 239 99.58%
Precinct no. 18 1008 300

29.76%

300 299 99.67%
Precinct no. 19 37 9

24.32%

9 9 100.00%
Precinct no. 20 26 4

15.38%

4 4 100.00%
   Page 1 of 2    Next page
Totalling: 25125 7888

31.40%

7879 7812 99.15%

2nd ballot on 26.11.2006

Number Family name and given names Age Education Address, party membership and endorsements Number of votes % votes
1 Grzegorek Zenon 58 wyższe Nakło nad Notecią, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Porozumienie Obywateli Powiatu Nakielskiego, endorsed by POPN, not a member of any political party 4927 63.07%
2 Światłowski Jan Władysław 54 wyższe techniczne Nakło nad Notecią, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców Jana Światłowskiego Razem dla Nakła, member of Sojuszu Lewicy Demokratycznej 2885 36.93%

Precincts

Precinct number Liczba głosów ważnych Grzegorek Zenon Głosów oddanych na kandydatów Światłowski Jan Władysław
Valid votes for the candidate Valid votes for the candidate
Number of % valid Number of % valid
Precinct no. 1 783 495

63.22%

495
288
288

36.78%

Precinct no. 2 475 264

55.58%

264
211
211

44.42%

Precinct no. 3 430 243

56.51%

243
187
187

43.49%

Precinct no. 4 362 256

70.72%

256
106
106

29.28%

Precinct no. 5 413 270

65.38%

270
143
143

34.62%

Precinct no. 6 798 501

62.78%

501
297
297

37.22%

Precinct no. 7 643 375

58.32%

375
268
268

41.68%

Precinct no. 8 310 209

67.42%

209
101
101

32.58%

Precinct no. 9 731 453

61.97%

453
278
278

38.03%

Precinct no. 10 448 293

65.40%

293
155
155

34.60%

Precinct no. 11 185 127

68.65%

127
58
58

31.35%

Precinct no. 12 71 54

76.06%

54
17
17

23.94%

Precinct no. 13 573 297

51.83%

297
276
276

48.17%

Precinct no. 14 286 190

66.43%

190
96
96

33.57%

Precinct no. 15 373 210

56.30%

210
163
163

43.70%

Precinct no. 16 354 259

73.16%

259
95
95

26.84%

Precinct no. 17 239 187

78.24%

187
52
52

21.76%

Precinct no. 18 299 223

74.58%

223
76
76

25.42%

Precinct no. 19 9 6

66.67%

6
3
3

33.33%

Precinct no. 20 4 2

50.00%

2
2
2

50.00%

   Page 1 of 2    Next page