City president election
Statistics
Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | |
44608 | 17974 |
40.29% ![]() |
17968 | 17592 | 97.91% |
Number | Family name and given names | Age | Education | Address, party membership and endorsements | Number of votes | % votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ciechanowicz Kazimierz | 60 | wyższe humanistyczne | Zawiercie, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców KAZIMIERZA CIECHANOWICZA, not a member of any political party | 450 | 2.56% |
2 | Imielski Konrad | 59 | wyższe pedagogiczne | Zawiercie, submitted by Koalicyjny Komitet Wyborczy SLD+SDPL+PD+UP Lewica i Demokraci, endorsed by Sojusz Lewicy Demokratycznej, member of Sojuszu Lewicy Demokratycznej | 1302 | 7.40% |
3 | Łukasiewicz Andrzej Szczepan | 55 | podstawowe | Zawiercie, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców Porozumienie Prawicy, member of Ligi Polskich Rodzin | 191 | 1.09% |
4 | Mach Ryszard | 60 | wyższe | Zawiercie, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców NIEZALEŻNA ALTERNATYWA WYBORCZA, not a member of any political party | 7055 | 40.10% |
5 | Mazur Mirosław | 38 | wyższe | Zawiercie, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Platforma Obywatelska RP, endorsed by Platformę Obywatelską Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej, member of Platformy Obywatelskiej Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej | 3960 | 22.51% |
6 | Mucha Popiel Teresa Anna | 39 | wyższe | Zawiercie, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców Praca i Solidarność, not a member of any political party | 1934 | 10.99% |
7 | Oleszczyk Ryszard Romuald | 58 | wyższe | Zawiercie, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców Porozumienie Samorządowe Jesteśmy Razem, endorsed by Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, member of Prawa i Sprawiedliwości | 2700 | 15.35% |
Precincts
Precinct number | Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | ||
Precinct no. 21 | 2017 | 849 |
42.09% ![]() |
849 | 831 | 97.88% |
Precinct no. 22 | 1277 | 405 |
31.71% ![]() |
405 | 393 | 97.04% |
Precinct no. 23 | 841 | 319 |
37.93% ![]() |
319 | 316 | 99.06% |
Precinct no. 24 | 1097 | 410 |
37.37% ![]() |
410 | 395 | 96.34% |
Precinct no. 25 | 1092 | 460 |
42.12% ![]() |
460 | 447 | 97.17% |
Precinct no. 26 | 1062 | 258 |
24.29% ![]() |
258 | 255 | 98.84% |
Precinct no. 27 | 868 | 370 |
42.63% ![]() |
370 | 361 | 97.57% |
Precinct no. 28 | 2230 | 791 |
35.47% ![]() |
789 | 762 | 96.58% |
Precinct no. 29 | 1576 | 587 |
37.25% ![]() |
587 | 576 | 98.13% |
Precinct no. 30 | 1783 | 675 |
37.86% ![]() |
675 | 655 | 97.04% |
Precinct no. 31 | 2517 | 1012 |
40.21% ![]() |
1011 | 996 | 98.52% |
Precinct no. 32 | 2456 | 1161 |
47.27% ![]() |
1161 | 1136 | 97.85% |
Precinct no. 33 | 1136 | 486 |
42.78% ![]() |
484 | 479 | 98.97% |
Precinct no. 34 | 72 | 14 |
19.44% ![]() |
14 | 13 | 92.86% |
Previous page
Page 2 of
2