City president election
Statistics
Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | |
226502 | 89523 |
39.52% |
89445 | 88447 | 98.88% |
Number | Family name and given names | Age | Education | Address, party membership and endorsements | Number of votes | % votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fedorowicz Andrzej | 56 | średnie techniczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Liga Polskich Rodzin, endorsed by Ligę Polskich Rodzin, member of Ligi Polskich Rodzin | 1909 | 2.16% |
2 | Gan Tomasz Edward | 50 | wyższe techniczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej, member of Samoobrony Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej | 697 | 0.79% |
3 | Kochan Janusz Ryszard | 60 | wyższe | Białystok, submitted by Koalicyjny Komitet Wyborczy SLD+SDPL+PD+UP Lewica i Demokraci, member of Sojuszu Lewicy Demokratycznej | 8550 | 9.67% |
4 | Kononowicz Krzysztof | 43 | zasadnicze zawodowe | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców "PODLASIE XXI WIEKU", not a member of any political party | 1676 | 1.89% |
5 | Kozłowski Marek Jan | 58 | wyższe ekonomiczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, endorsed by Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, member of Prawa i Sprawiedliwości | 28846 | 32.61% |
6 | Sawicki Krzysztof | 46 | wyższe techniczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Chrześcijańskiego Ruchu Samorządowego, endorsed by Chrześcijański Ruch Samorządowy, not a member of any political party | 3880 | 4.39% |
7 | Truskolaski Tadeusz | 48 | wyższe ekonomiczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Platforma Obywatelska RP, not a member of any political party | 42889 | 48.49% |
Precincts
Precinct number | Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | ||
Precinct no. 41 | 1028 | 427 |
41.54% |
427 | 423 | 99.06% |
Precinct no. 42 | 1449 | 683 |
47.14% |
683 | 672 | 98.39% |
Precinct no. 43 | 2000 | 833 |
41.65% |
830 | 822 | 99.04% |
Precinct no. 44 | 1694 | 635 |
37.49% |
635 | 628 | 98.90% |
Precinct no. 45 | 2284 | 996 |
43.61% |
996 | 985 | 98.90% |
Precinct no. 46 | 2099 | 909 |
43.31% |
909 | 901 | 99.12% |
Precinct no. 47 | 614 | 195 |
31.76% |
195 | 193 | 98.97% |
Precinct no. 48 | 1885 | 841 |
44.62% |
841 | 832 | 98.93% |
Precinct no. 49 | 2173 | 961 |
44.22% |
956 | 948 | 99.16% |
Precinct no. 50 | 2206 | 1113 |
50.45% |
1113 | 1099 | 98.74% |
Precinct no. 51 | 1050 | 516 |
49.14% |
516 | 509 | 98.64% |
Precinct no. 52 | 1407 | 561 |
39.87% |
560 | 558 | 99.64% |
Precinct no. 53 | 1624 | 663 |
40.83% |
662 | 657 | 99.24% |
Precinct no. 54 | 1661 | 634 |
38.17% |
634 | 628 | 99.05% |
Precinct no. 55 | 2238 | 992 |
44.33% |
992 | 985 | 99.29% |
Precinct no. 56 | 1407 | 496 |
35.25% |
496 | 490 | 98.79% |
Precinct no. 57 | 887 | 309 |
34.84% |
309 | 305 | 98.71% |
Precinct no. 58 | 1799 | 733 |
40.74% |
733 | 723 | 98.64% |
Precinct no. 59 | 1227 | 514 |
41.89% |
514 | 508 | 98.83% |
Precinct no. 60 | 1353 | 595 |
43.98% |
595 | 592 | 99.50% |
Previous page
Page 3 of
9
Next page