City president election
Statistics
| Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | |
| 226502 | 89523 |
39.52% 
|
89445 | 88447 | 98.88% |
| Number | Family name and given names | Age | Education | Address, party membership and endorsements | Number of votes | % votes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fedorowicz Andrzej | 56 | średnie techniczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Liga Polskich Rodzin, endorsed by Ligę Polskich Rodzin, member of Ligi Polskich Rodzin | 1909 | 2.16% |
| 2 | Gan Tomasz Edward | 50 | wyższe techniczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej, member of Samoobrony Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej | 697 | 0.79% |
| 3 | Kochan Janusz Ryszard | 60 | wyższe | Białystok, submitted by Koalicyjny Komitet Wyborczy SLD+SDPL+PD+UP Lewica i Demokraci, member of Sojuszu Lewicy Demokratycznej | 8550 | 9.67% |
| 4 | Kononowicz Krzysztof | 43 | zasadnicze zawodowe | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców "PODLASIE XXI WIEKU", not a member of any political party | 1676 | 1.89% |
| 5 | Kozłowski Marek Jan | 58 | wyższe ekonomiczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, endorsed by Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, member of Prawa i Sprawiedliwości | 28846 | 32.61% |
| 6 | Sawicki Krzysztof | 46 | wyższe techniczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Chrześcijańskiego Ruchu Samorządowego, endorsed by Chrześcijański Ruch Samorządowy, not a member of any political party | 3880 | 4.39% |
| 7 | Truskolaski Tadeusz | 48 | wyższe ekonomiczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Platforma Obywatelska RP, not a member of any political party | 42889 | 48.49% |
Precincts
| Precinct number | Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | ||
| Precinct no. 1 | 2087 | 910 |
43.60%
|
910 | 901 | 99.01% |
| Precinct no. 2 | 1401 | 535 |
38.19%
|
534 | 525 | 98.31% |
| Precinct no. 3 | 1711 | 831 |
48.57%
|
831 | 816 | 98.19% |
| Precinct no. 4 | 1031 | 430 |
41.71%
|
429 | 412 | 96.04% |
| Precinct no. 5 | 693 | 175 |
25.25%
|
174 | 174 | 100.00% |
| Precinct no. 6 | 1172 | 580 |
49.49%
|
580 | 575 | 99.14% |
| Precinct no. 7 | 1937 | 845 |
43.62%
|
845 | 839 | 99.29% |
| Precinct no. 8 | 1313 | 518 |
39.45%
|
518 | 509 | 98.26% |
| Precinct no. 9 | 1643 | 663 |
40.35%
|
662 | 650 | 98.19% |
| Precinct no. 10 | 2027 | 970 |
47.85%
|
968 | 954 | 98.55% |
| Precinct no. 11 | 2082 | 938 |
45.05%
|
937 | 927 | 98.93% |
| Precinct no. 12 | 1615 | 601 |
37.21%
|
599 | 596 | 99.50% |
| Precinct no. 13 | 1960 | 700 |
35.71%
|
700 | 696 | 99.43% |
| Precinct no. 14 | 1955 | 791 |
40.46%
|
791 | 779 | 98.48% |
| Precinct no. 15 | 1672 | 521 |
31.16%
|
517 | 504 | 97.49% |
| Precinct no. 16 | 1072 | 373 |
34.79%
|
373 | 364 | 97.59% |
| Precinct no. 17 | 1789 | 816 |
45.61%
|
816 | 806 | 98.77% |
| Precinct no. 18 | 1837 | 841 |
45.78%
|
841 | 840 | 99.88% |
| Precinct no. 19 | 1123 | 470 |
41.85%
|
470 | 468 | 99.57% |
| Precinct no. 20 | 2120 | 762 |
35.94%
|
762 | 745 | 97.77% |
Page 1 of
9
Next page