City president election
Statistics
Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | |
226502 | 89523 |
39.52% |
89445 | 88447 | 98.88% |
Number | Family name and given names | Age | Education | Address, party membership and endorsements | Number of votes | % votes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Fedorowicz Andrzej | 56 | średnie techniczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Liga Polskich Rodzin, endorsed by Ligę Polskich Rodzin, member of Ligi Polskich Rodzin | 1909 | 2.16% |
2 | Gan Tomasz Edward | 50 | wyższe techniczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Samoobrona Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej, member of Samoobrony Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej | 697 | 0.79% |
3 | Kochan Janusz Ryszard | 60 | wyższe | Białystok, submitted by Koalicyjny Komitet Wyborczy SLD+SDPL+PD+UP Lewica i Demokraci, member of Sojuszu Lewicy Demokratycznej | 8550 | 9.67% |
4 | Kononowicz Krzysztof | 43 | zasadnicze zawodowe | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Wyborców "PODLASIE XXI WIEKU", not a member of any political party | 1676 | 1.89% |
5 | Kozłowski Marek Jan | 58 | wyższe ekonomiczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, endorsed by Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, member of Prawa i Sprawiedliwości | 28846 | 32.61% |
6 | Sawicki Krzysztof | 46 | wyższe techniczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Chrześcijańskiego Ruchu Samorządowego, endorsed by Chrześcijański Ruch Samorządowy, not a member of any political party | 3880 | 4.39% |
7 | Truskolaski Tadeusz | 48 | wyższe ekonomiczne | Białystok, submitted by Komitet Wyborczy Platforma Obywatelska RP, not a member of any political party | 42889 | 48.49% |
Precincts
Precinct number | Number of | Turnout | Number of votes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
electors | dispensed ballot cards | cast | valid | % valid | ||
Precinct no. 61 | 1109 | 473 |
42.65% |
473 | 466 | 98.52% |
Precinct no. 62 | 1997 | 683 |
34.20% |
683 | 677 | 99.12% |
Precinct no. 63 | 1221 | 562 |
46.03% |
562 | 549 | 97.69% |
Precinct no. 64 | 563 | 272 |
48.31% |
272 | 271 | 99.63% |
Precinct no. 65 | 809 | 346 |
42.77% |
346 | 343 | 99.13% |
Precinct no. 66 | 1642 | 651 |
39.65% |
651 | 643 | 98.77% |
Precinct no. 67 | 1865 | 769 |
41.23% |
765 | 761 | 99.48% |
Precinct no. 68 | 1949 | 768 |
39.40% |
768 | 757 | 98.57% |
Precinct no. 69 | 1589 | 607 |
38.20% |
607 | 596 | 98.19% |
Precinct no. 70 | 1539 | 588 |
38.21% |
588 | 583 | 99.15% |
Precinct no. 71 | 1141 | 457 |
40.05% |
452 | 450 | 99.56% |
Precinct no. 72 | 1014 | 376 |
37.08% |
376 | 376 | 100.00% |
Precinct no. 73 | 1132 | 418 |
36.93% |
418 | 411 | 98.33% |
Precinct no. 74 | 834 | 351 |
42.09% |
351 | 347 | 98.86% |
Precinct no. 75 | 1021 | 432 |
42.31% |
432 | 430 | 99.54% |
Precinct no. 76 | 1512 | 684 |
45.24% |
683 | 676 | 98.98% |
Precinct no. 77 | 1822 | 739 |
40.56% |
739 | 728 | 98.51% |
Precinct no. 78 | 1151 | 465 |
40.40% |
465 | 456 | 98.06% |
Precinct no. 79 | 1198 | 445 |
37.15% |
445 | 441 | 99.10% |
Precinct no. 80 | 1552 | 499 |
32.15% |
498 | 493 | 99.00% |
Previous page
Page 4 of
9
Next page